- a cardiac stress test, to ensure the patient is healthy enough for sex
- counseling that is based off considering celibacy as a lifestyle choice
- a 24 hour wait period, so that the patient would have time to really consider the side effects
- consent from their sexual partner, stating that they are aware of their erectile dysfunction.
McLeod has proposed this new bill in an attempt to make the male and republican dominate house understand why the regulations on women's reproductive issues is so unjust. South Carolina has some of the toughest abortion laws and restrictions in the country. Some of those regulations include:
- state sponsored counseling designed to discourage abortion
- 24 hour wait period to understand side effects of choosing to have an abortion
- parental consent must be presented for any minor 17 and under.
I get that Viagra and abortion are two very different topics, however what this woman has done is open a door to why our state/federal government should have no say in the reproductive health of men or women. I agree with McLeod's idea. I think it's brilliant. This law isn't something she hopes will pass, it is designed to help men better understand why these laws and regulations are unfair to women. I've always believed women are restricted when it comes to our reproductive health. For example, men will never understand how uncomfortable a pap smear is. As a woman who wants to be responsible and take birth control (so that I don't have to struggle with the decisions of an unwanted pregnancy) I HAVE to have this invasive procedure every three years (which was finally just changed from ONCE a year). There is no true medical need for a pap when one is trying to obtain contraceptive. It became common for doctors to require one once a year so that they may test for cervical cancer. I get that at the end of the day it's in my best interest to have one. However, this is the reason so many women aren't on birth control. They don't want to have to go through hoops to get it. So, why is it so easy for men to receive Viagra?
I applaud Ms. McLeod on her efforts. Though the bill will not pass (and it shouldn't), I believe she has really opened a few closed minds on a very important subject.
I have not personally heard this story but I am honestly glad I chose to read your blog! What she has proposed is genius, it not only notifies the men of the United States how restricted women reproductive rights are, but even the women against certain reproductive rights are now also becoming aware. I would have to agree with your argument for this law to be heard. This is one giant step in backing the rights of women and should be taken very seriously. I also love how Ms. McLeod uses a substance such as Viagra, commonly used for pleasure purposes and not reproductive just to catch our male audience’s attention. I am glad this is being brought into attention for multiple reasons rather than just in favor of abortion. I think when many people hear “reproductive rights for women” they automatically assume they would be supporting abortion. On the contrary, your blog points out that it is more than that, it’s the constant test, exams, and doctor visits required to obtain contraception that is also a problem at hand. I appreciate this blog for the reasons that it will open many people’s minds up to such a filtered and contained topic that deserves to be heard, GREAT JOB!
ReplyDelete